Cases 1 - 10 of 17
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Rudolph v. Sheryl Lloyd, et al
as 19-1124
Defendant / Appellant:
KIM TRENT, DAVID HOULE, SHERYL LLOYD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES RUDOLPH
InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA et al v. Board of Governors of Wayne State University et al
as 1:2018cv00231
Plaintiff:
InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA and InterVarsity Christian Fellowship Wayne State University Chapter
Defendant:
Board of Governors of Wayne State University , Richard Snyder, William Schuette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Wine et al
as 0:2017cv03885
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Kelly
Defendant:
Scott W. Wine , Annette K. Clayton , Kevin M. Farr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv10953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barkovic v. Attorney Grievance Commission et al
as 2:2017cv10281
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barkovic
Defendant:
Attorney Grievance Commission, Alan Gershel, Robert Edick and others
Larry Meitzner v. Robert Young, Jr., et al
as 16-1479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY A. MEITZNER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT P. YOUNG, JR., MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY and others
Meitzner v. Young et al
as 1:2015cv14444
Plaintiff:
Larry Meitzner
Defendant:
Robert P. Young, Jr., Michael F. Cavanagh, Marilyn Kelly and others
Patrick McCarthy v. Corbin Davis, et al
as 12-1096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK MCCARTHY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORBIN R. DAVIS, INGER Z. MEYER, ROBERT P. YOUNG, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
