Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mario Keene
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Lefford et al v. Stowe et al
as 2:2024cv02117
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Mark Lefford, Maria Lefford and Mario Perez
Defendant:
Mindi Stowe and Philips North America, LLC. d/b/a Philips Health Care Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reed v. Poplar Arts Lofts, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02569
Plaintiff:
Mario Reed
Defendant:
Poplar Arts Lofts, LLC, Renaissance Group, Inc., Vincent D. Smith, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Reed v. Madison Gardens of Memphis, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02772
Plaintiff:
Mario Reed
Defendant:
Madison Gardens of Memphis, LLC and Chamkaur Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Reed v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02727
Plaintiff:
Mario Reed
Defendant:
Vincent D. Smith, Jr., HA Memphis Holdings, LLC and Renaissance Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Hicks et al v. Cantrell et al
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Grant Hicks, Tristan Nixon and Lucas Mario Nutt
Defendant:
Wesley Cantrell, Jonathan Fenoy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irizarry v. Rowland
as 3:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Mario De'Angelo Irizarry
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. USA
as 2:2022cv00016
Petitioner:
Mario Ambrosio Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
