Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04046
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RISENHOOVER v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00039
Defendant:
WILLIAM CHRISTENSEN, TARO KONO, PHILIP S. DAVIDSON and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salloum v. Kable et al
as 4:2019cv13505
Defendant:
Dep. Dir. Op of TSC G. Clayton Grigg, Comm. CBP Mark A. Morgan, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Salloum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Guan et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2019cv06570
Defendant:
Director of ICE Mark A Morgan, Chad F. Wolf and Matthew T. Albence
Plaintiff:
Kitra Cahana, Go Nakamura, Bing Guan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ABUDUMIJITI v. WRAY et al
as 1:2019cv02588
Defendant:
CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, HON JOSEPH MAGUIRE, Acting Commissioner MARK MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. TUEGAN ABUDUMIJITI and TUEGAN ABUDUMIJITI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dousa v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2019cv01255
Defendant:
Kevin K. McAleenan, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Matthew T. Albence and others
Plaintiff:
Kaji Dousa
Amicus Curiae:
Katherine M. Franke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb
FIFE et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv13912
Defendant:
JUDSON W. MURDOCK, II, MARK A MORGAN, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN G. AND ELIZABETH STEELMAN FOUNDATION and H. FRANK FIFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES-SOTO v. BARR et al
as 7:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres-Soto and OLAMIDE KOLADE ABEBAYO ABIALA
Defendant:
KEVIN K MCALEENAN, PHIL BICKHAM, MARK A MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
