Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Amesbury v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury d/b/a Polytecnic
Defendant:
Hannah Burnes, David Goldstein, Donald Grebien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amesbury v. Sisson et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury d/b/a Polytechnic
Defendant:
William Sisson, Dave Goldstein, Pawtucket Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2020cv00348
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, J Hanley, David Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amesbury v. Doe
as 1:2020cv00077
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2019cv00651
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Michael Polaceck, Melissa C. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2019cv00342
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Michael Polaceck, William D. Vieira, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2019cv00082
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Donna M Pinto, Donald Grebien and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parshall v. Coastway Bancorp, Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00279
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Coastway Bancorp, Inc, Mark E Crevier, Debra M Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Brasil et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Brasil and Angela A. Brasil
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plante v. Erwin, Esq.
as 1:2013cv00261
Plaintiff:
Wesley Dana Plante
Defendant:
Mark E. Erwin, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
