Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2138
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00485
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv09051
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roger Palmer, et al v. Stephen Sisolak, et al
as 22-15645
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROGER PALMER, CHAD MOXLEY and FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD, A.G., GEORGE TOGLIATTI and others
Defendant: JOSEPH LOMBARDO, STEVEN WOLFSON, DANIEL J. COVERLEY and others
Shepherd v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv01319
Plaintiff: Valerie Shepherd
Defendant: New York Knick Mark Jackson and James Dolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Palmer et al v. Sisolak et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00268
Defendant: LVMPD Officer Joseph Lombardo, Mark Jackson, Mindy McKay and others
Plaintiff: Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Chad Moxley and Roger Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv01475
Not Classified By Court: Mark Jackson and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00091
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03557
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01307
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?