Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Ducasse v. King
as 0:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Hiram Ducasse, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Clinkenbeard v. Mark King
as 24-1370
Petitioner:
Robert Joseph Dale Clinkenbeard
Respondent:
Mark King and Mark King, Warden
Canete v. King
as 0:2024cv00399
Petitioner:
Giobel Fonseca Canete
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Montano v. King
as 0:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Felix Aguirre Montano
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Balleza v. King
as 0:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Hector Balleza
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clinkenbeard v. King
as 0:2023cv03151
Petitioner:
Robert Clinkenbeard
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore et al v. Washington et al
as 5:2023cv11506
Plaintiff:
John Moore, II, Nazem Saad, Kenneth Matlock and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Mark King, Adrian Dirschell and others
King et al v. Udoji-Eddings et al
as 6:2022cv03314
Petitioner:
Conservator Mark King, Mercy Udoji, Esther Udoji and others
Plaintiff:
Felicia O Udoji, Timothy Udoji and Mark King
Not Classified By Court:
Gary Temple
Guardian Ad Litem:
Karl Warden
Defendant:
Felicia Udoji-Eddings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dylan Higgins et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04994
Plaintiff:
Holly Kane, Dylan Higgins, Jodie Hill and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Higgins et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Holly Kane, Dylan Higgins, Jodie Hill and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
