Cases 1 - 10 of 133
WOODS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WOODS v. WARDEN USP CANAAN
as 2:2024cv01833
Petitioner:
MARK WOODS
Respondent:
WARDEN USP CANAAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Velez (Garcia)
as 24-923
Defendant:
JONATHAN GARCIA, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alexander et al v. Wood et al
as 1:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Laneesha Alexander and Rebecca Nichols
Defendant:
Mark Wood and Rodney Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dunn v. F B I et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Catherine Chase Nugent Dunn
Defendant:
F B I, Sheriffs Office Rapides Parish, City of New Orleans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Damond v. Alexandria et al
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, Mark Wood, Colin Radar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scarborough v. Rapides Parish Detention Center I et al
as 1:2023cv01695
Plaintiff:
Desmond Deondre Scarborough
Defendant:
Rapides Parish Detention Center I, Guard Phibbs, Guard Fullers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander et al v. Wood et al
as 3:2023cv01565
Plaintiff:
Laneesha Alexander and Rebecca Nichols
Defendant:
Mark Wood and Rodney Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Alexander et al v. Wood et al
as 1:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Laneesha Alexander and Rebecca Nichols
Defendant:
Mark Wood and Rodney Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Woods v. Garza
as 3:2023cv01718
Petitioner:
Mark Woods
Respondent:
Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
