Cases 1 - 10 of 1,154
Ellis-Erkkila v. Manske
as 24-50329
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Manske, Magistrate Judge Gilliland, Administrative Courts Counsel and others
Sappington v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
William C. Sappington
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Memphis TN and Benton County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lebron-Rivera v. State of Texas
as 24-50146
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera
Defendant:
State of Texas, Richard Gillete, Sheriff, Gary Painter, Sheriff and others
Aikens v. Marshal Service
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Aikens
Defendant:
U S Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shaffer v. Iteka et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Phillip Marshall Shaffer
Defendant:
Rolie Iteka, Kevin Schiwart, Jennifer Cozby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Gregory Marshall Hill
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Moore v. West Texas Detention Facility et al
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lee Moore
Defendant:
West Texas Detention Facility and US Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conlin v. United States of America et al
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Conlin, John Doe and Texas Doe
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
