Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Mwichigi et al v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv05691
Defendant:
Marvin Marshall, Futuro Trucking, Inc., Federal Express Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Mwichigi and Joyce Gicheru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Marshall v. Dubek
as 2:2024cv01190
Defendant:
Dubek
Plaintiff:
William Boyd Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crew v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Marshall Sidell Crew
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kloepfel v. Cowles et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Defendant:
Raymond Cowles, Dan Dice and Unknown Agents, US Marshal
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Joseph Kloepfel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00221
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kloepfel v. Hammer et al
as 3:2024cv05456
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Joseph Kloepfel
Defendant:
Hammer and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benshoof v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2024cv00808
Defendant:
J Doe, Jessica Skelton, Marshall Ferguson and others
Interested Party:
Howard Brown
Plaintiff:
Kurt Benshoof
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rudder v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv05418
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Brandon Marshall
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lea Rudder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Steven Craig Marshall
as 2:2024rd00017
Unknown:
Steven Craig Marshall
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Crew v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00709
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Marshall Sidell Crew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
