Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Archer v. Fisher et al
as 4:2015cv00101
Petitioner:
Ricky Archer
Respondent:
Marshall L. Fisher and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
George Bass v. Marshall Fisher, et al
as 15-60535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE MICHAEL BASS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL L. FISHER and EARNEST LEE
Curtis Evans v. Marshall Fisher, Commissioner, et al
as 15-60508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS CHRISHAUN EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and N. HOGAN, Warden
Charleston DePriest, et al v. Walnut Grove Corrtl Auth
as 15-60488
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLESTON DEPRIEST, as father and next friend of C.B. a minor, ERIC BALL, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated individuals, ERIK BARNES, on behalf of hemself and all similarly situated individuals and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Holt v. Rowan et al
as 5:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tarrius D. Holt
Defendant:
Unknown Rowan, Gabriel Walker, Unknown King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Fisher et al
as 4:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Singleton
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher, Jerry Williams, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joiner v. Morton et al
as 3:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
Sedrick Leazjoun Joiner
Defendant:
Unknown Morton and Marshall L. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass v. Fisher et al
as 4:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
George Michael Bass
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Truelove v. Marshall Fisher, Commissioner
as 15-60389
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY LEE TRUELOVE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Noe v. Fisher et al
as 4:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Herwins Noe
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
