Cases 71 - 80 of 143
Tommy White v. Jacqueline Banks, et al
as 17-60645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY DEMINTO WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE BANKS, MARSHALL TURNER, HUBERT DAVIS and others
Plumier et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00713
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade Plumier and Estate of Robert Wayne Plumier
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, South Mississippi Correctional Institution, Jacquelyn Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demario Walker v. Johnathan Hunt, et al
as 17-60511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMARIO DONTEZ WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNATHAN D. HUNT, Correction Integrity Investigator, MARSHALL FISHER, MARSHALL TURNER and others
Davis v. Banks et al
as 1:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Glen Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Jaqueline Banks, Marshal Turner and Regina Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Taha et al
as 1:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Devin Scott Thornton
Defendant:
Mastafa Taha, Joy Ross and Marshal Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldsmith v. Banks et al
as 1:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Goldsmith
Defendant:
Jacqueline Banks, Marshall Turner, Mark Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Hall et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Brent Everett Ryan
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Jacqueline Banks, Marshall Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbin v. Turner et al
as 4:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
David Lee Harbin
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Felicia Hall, Jacquelyn Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Avery v. Marshall Turner
as 17-60237
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM AVERY
Respondent - Appellee:
MARSHALL TURNER, Warden, South Mississippi Correctional Institution
Britton v. Hall et al
as 1:2017cv00096
Plaintiff:
M. DeSean Britton
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Jacqulyn Banks, Marshall Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
