Cases 1 - 10 of 1,074
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JACKSON v. CITY OF MARSHALL et al
as 2:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tenya JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF MARSHALL, Chief City of Marshall Police Department, Antonio Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reed et al v. Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Company et al
as 4:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Albert Reed and Norma Nicholas-Reed
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle & Property Insurance Company and Vernon Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Johnson v. City of Marshall, Texas
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
City of Marshall, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaffer v. Iteka et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Phillip Marshall Shaffer
Defendant:
Rolie Iteka, Kevin Schiwart, Jennifer Cozby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen-Smith v. US Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen-Smith
Defendant:
US Marshall and FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marshall v. Lear Corporation
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marshall
Defendant:
Lear Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hill v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Gregory Marshall Hill
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
