Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Perez-Lopez
as 24-40241
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Martha Guadalupe Perez-Lopez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Perez-Lopez v. USA
as 4:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Martha Guadalupe Perez-Lopez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Perez-Lopez
as 23-40587
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Martha Guadalupe Perez-Lopez
Gomez et al v. Dormont Manufacturing Company et al
as 1:2021cv06932
Plaintiff:
Socorro Gomez, Fernando Arellano and Martha Guadalupe Lopez Trinidad
Defendant:
Dormont Manufacturing Company and 148-150 Westchester Avenue, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Gomez et al v. Dormont Manufacturing Company et al
as 7:2020cv07395
Defendant:
148-150 Westchester Avenue, LLC and Dormont Manufacturing Company
Plaintiff:
Socorro Gomez, Lopez Trinidad Guadalupe Martha, Arellano Fernando and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruben Garcia et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2016cv01725
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garcia , Pedro Abrajan , Roman Aguilar and others
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara and Service Employees International Union Local 521
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
USA v. Mendoza-Valerio et al
as 8:2012mj00037
Material Witne:
Victor Manuel Arraiga-Perez and Martha Guadalupe Cruz-Rueda
Defendant:
Eusebio Mendoza-Valerio (1), Mario Guadalupe Moreno-Soto (2) and Jose Sedano-Chavez (3)
Plaintiff:
USA
Eusebio Mendoza-Valerio
as 8:2012mj00037
Material Witne:
Victor Manuel Arraiga-Perez and Martha Guadalupe Cruz-Rueda
Defendant:
Eusebio Mendoza-Valerio (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Jose Sedano-Chavez
as 8:2012mj00037
Material Witne:
Victor Manuel Arraiga-Perez and Martha Guadalupe Cruz-Rueda
Defendant:
Jose Sedano-Chavez (3)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
