Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PEPAJ et al v. Food Tek, Inc. d/b/a Bleu Martini et al
as 2:2023cv05024
Plaintiff:
EVA PEPAJ and SANDRA VALENCIA
Defendant:
Food Tek, Inc. d/b/a Bleu Martini and Meir Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
KELLY EL v. MARTINI
as 2:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
GENE KELLY EL
Defendant:
NICHOLAS C. MARTINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STROUD et al v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2019cv01289
Defendant:
JAMES A. MOTZNIK, ROBERT P. RAVENSTAHL, JR., PRESIDENT JUDGE KIM BERKELEY CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
POSTINDUSTRIAL and MATT STROUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODGERS v. LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv00350
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. RODGERS
Defendant:
ROBERT MARTINI, LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY and MARTINI FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tearpock-Martini v. Shickshinny Borough et al
as 3:2012cv02223
Plaintiff:
Francene Tearpock-Martini
Defendant:
Shickshinny Borough , Jule Moore , Michael Steeber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HOLLAND v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2012cv04504
Petitioner:
MARTINIS HOLLAND
Respondent:
STEVEN A. GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY v. MARTINI
as 2:2012cv00622
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
ISADORE F. MARTINI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINI v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58908
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MARTINI
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MARTINI v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv53640
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD R. MARTINI
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
