Cases 1 - 10 of 45
GRAY v. MARTZ et al
as 1:2023cv01898
Plaintiff:
CHALLIE A. GRAY
Defendant:
MARTZ, BYERS, GOODNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. MARTZ et al
as 1:2023cv01694
Plaintiff:
JASON L. SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
B. MARTZ, R. STEPHENS, S. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martz v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10988
Plaintiff:
Angie Martz
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JOHNSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
DANNY LEROY JOHNSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAYJOR CONYERS, BRIAN MARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. I.D.O.C. MEDICAL et al
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
ZECHARIAH B. JAMES
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. MEDICAL, MENTAL HEALTH STAFF DEPARTMENT, MEDICAL COMPANY P.C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilder v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wilder
Defendant:
Christian K Mitchell, Sherri Lynn Kinzie, Danielle Nicole Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE L JOHNSON, JR and FRANKIE LEE JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., MARTZ and REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. MARTZ et al
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
LANICO PAYNE
Defendant:
BRIAN MARTZ and C. QUARRIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. MASON et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
LANICO PAYNE
Defendant:
DAVID MASON, AARON SMITH, M. CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
