Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Byron Martz v. Day Development Company, L.C.
as 19-2241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BYRON W. MARTZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.C. and SOUTHLAWN LANE PROPERTIES, LLC
Byron Martz v. Day Development Company, L.C.
as 19-2186
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BYRON W. MARTZ
Defendant / Appellant:
DAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.C. and SOUTHLAWN LANE PROPERTIES, LLC
Hollis Martz v. Sheriff Benny Simmons
as 19-2750
Defendant:
Johnny Cooke, Deputy, Erin Hunter, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Manya Wood, Deputy Prosecuting Attonery, Sevier County and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Benny Simmons
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hollis Devin Martz
Hollis Martz v. Matthew Webb, et al
as 19-2048
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Hollis Devin Martz
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Gentry, Investigator Sevier County Detention, Chad Dowdle, Deputy Sevier County Detention Center, Thomas Jackson, Deputy Sevier County Detention Center and others
Gregory Foley v. Lacey Martz, et al
as 19-55337
Defendant / Appellee:
LACEY MARTZ, In Her Individual "Capasity" and SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, In Their Official "Capasity"
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY D. FOLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Oakley et al v. The Citizens Bank of Logan, Ohio et al
as 2:2015cv01263
Plaintiff:
Jack V. Oakley and Saranne Oakley
Defendant:
The Citizens Bank of Logan, Ohio, Citizens Independent Bancorp, Inc., Bryan K. Starner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARTZ et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00329
Petitioner:
DANIEL MARTZ and TARA MARTZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
Martz v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-01421
Plaintiff:
Libby Ellen Martz
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
