Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Timms et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01859
Plaintiff:
Janene Timms , Charlene Ault , Darlene Bedford and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinton et al v. Bayer Corp. et al
as 4:2016cv01679
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Hinton , Elizabeth Stratton , Tiffany Dinger and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corp. , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Timms et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv00733
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janene Timms , Charlene Ault , Darlene Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cowan v. Martz et al
as 5:2012cv06073
Plaintiff:
Scott Conrad Cowan
Defendant:
George W. Martz, Harrison County Sheriff's Department and Josh Eckerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ousley v. Harrison County, Missouri et al
as 5:2012cv00512
Plaintiff:
Shayla Ousley
Defendant:
Harrison County, Missouri , George W. Martz and Jesse Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettis v. Martz et al
as 5:2012cv06025
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pettis
Defendant:
George Martz, Pam Parkhurst and Harrison County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adler v. Harrison County Jail, et al.
as 5:2012cv06020
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Adler
Defendant:
George Martz, Pam Parkhurst and Harrison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Harrison County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2012cv06019
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J Wyatt
Defendant:
George Martz, Pam Parkhurst and Corey Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick v. Harrison County Correction Center et al
as 5:2012cv06018
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Patrick
Defendant:
Harrison County Correction Center, George Martz and Pam Parkhurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
