Cases
US v. James Poole We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-4093
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES MARVIN POOLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3238
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
POOLE ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75376
Plaintiff: TONY MARVIN POOLE
Defendant: 3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
POOLE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2007cv70853
Plaintiff: JUANITA POOLE, GERMAINE POOLE LOUVIERE, LENTON MARVIN POOLE and others
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
POOLE et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv64499
Plaintiff: ROBERT MARVIN POOLE and TANA F. POOLE
Defendant: AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Counter Claimant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY
Cross Defendant: GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Robert Marvin Poole, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:07-CV-00083
Plaintiff: Robert Marvin Poole
Defendant: Aqua-Chem, Inc
Poole et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00083
Plaintiff: Robert Marvin Poole and Tana F. Poole
Defendant: Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., A. W. Chesterton Company and others
Cross Claimant: A. W. Chesterton Company and Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc.
Cross Defendant: General Refractories Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation, National Service Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?