Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Laudano v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv01919
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Mary Ellen Castro, Penny Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Laudano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Maurer et al
as 3:2018cv00694
Plaintiff:
Carvaughn Johnson
Defendant:
Kathleen Maurer, John Street, Connie Weikopf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacques v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jean Jacques
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Scott Semple, Anthony Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schroff v. Castro et al
as 3:2017cv02151
Plaintiff:
William B. Schroff
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Castro, Monica Farinella, David Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Feliciano
as 17-3037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant - Appellee:
Jose Feliciano, Denise Walker, Scott Semple and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Employees 1-15 Employed at NHCC, Jane Doe, Employees 1-15 Employed at NHCC, John Doe, Employees 1-15 Employed at BCC and others
Wright v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01530
Plaintiff:
Ian Wright
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurenda, Leo Arnone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Feliciano et al
as 3:2017cv00269
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Jose Feliciano, Allison Black, Denise Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. McCrystal et al
as 3:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivera
Defendant:
Kevin McCrystal, Johnny Wu, Mary Ellen Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cerilli v. Malloy et al
as 3:2016cv02088
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Dannel P. Malloy, Scott Semple, Johnny Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Feliciano et al
as 3:2016cv01766
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Jose Feliciano, Allison Black, Denise Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
