Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38539
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARY RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Rice and Susan Marie Rice
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv08219
Plaintiff:
Mary Rice
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv00853
Plaintiff:
Rosa Marie Rice
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICE et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv81005
Plaintiff:
MARIE RICE and J.F. RICE
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, DANA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICE v. RAPID AMERICAN CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv90242
Plaintiff:
J.F. RICE and MARIE RICE
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORP., PFIZER, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RICE et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67724
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GEORGE RICE and CAROLINE MARIE RICE
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORP. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RICE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2007cv64315
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. RICE and MARY RICE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP, KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
