Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Berihu Fkadu v. Atascadero State Hospital, et al
as 19-56374
Defendant / Appellee:
S. CAMDEN, A.P.T., individual and official capacity, TINA, individual and official capacity, STERLING PRICE, executive director, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BERIHU HADERA FKADU
Berihu Hadera Fkadu v. Atascadero State Hospital et al
as 2:2019cv09116
Defendant:
Jennifer Partell, ASH Clinical Administrator, Witt Penelope and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berihu Hadera Fkadu v. ASH et al
as 2:2019cv07857
Defendant:
Dewayn, Danielle Paladino, David Peter and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu Hadera Fkadu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oppenheimer v. Janovich et al
as 2:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Intellimark Technologies, Inc., Hopscotch Presents LLC, Mason M Merrill and others
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Oppenheimer v. Janovich et al
as 5:2019cv00246
Defendant:
Intellimark Technologies, Inc., Hopscotch Presents LLC, Mason M Merrill and others
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Mason Johnson v. USA
as 18-2797
Petitioner - Appellant:
MASON M. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Berihu Fkadu v. Sterling C. Price et al
as 2:2017cv04658
Respondent:
Chand, Dawn Donovan, Mr. Mason M. Nutter and others
Plaintiff:
Berihu H. Fkadu
Fkadu v. Price et al
as 3:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
Berihu H. Fkadu
Defendant:
Stirling C. Price, S. Yakhu, Marilou Rosas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
