Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Noe v. Summerford et al
as 4:2024cv01126
Defendant:
Colby L Mathews and Summer McWhorter Summerford
Plaintiff:
Terry R Noe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
College v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Mathews, Jr., Judson College, Joan Vignes Newman and others
Defendant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Company, ken Goforth and USI Insurance Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Woodard v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Alcaliph Woodard
Defendant:
Domingo Gonzales, Terrance Davis, Chris Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Wade
as 1:2023cv00657
Petitioner:
Thomas Hal Marshall
Respondent:
Mathew Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carstarphen v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen and Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kennth Gillespie, Mathew Simpson, Robert H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mathews v. Neely
as 7:2022cv01141
Petitioner:
Quiana Mathews
Respondent:
Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mathews v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
Quiana Mathews
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathews v. Johnson
as 7:2022cv01091
Plaintiff:
Quiana Mathews
Defendant:
Kermit Johnson, H. Bryant and Mr. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrington v. Rex Lumber, Troy, LLC
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Mathew Hedrington
Defendant:
Rex Lumber, Troy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
