Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Randall Otvos v. State of North Carolina
as 23-2225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL OTVOS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WILKES COUNTY, DEPUTY LANDEN JAMES-DEAN BYRD, Wilkes County Office Employee and others
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Andre Sweeper v. Vernetia Dozier
as 22-6673
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE SWEEPER
Defendant / Appellee:
VERNETIA DOZIER, LIEUTENANT ARELIA MATHIS, LIEUTENANT CAROLYN MURDOCK and others
Roland Mathis v. D.L. Young
as 22-6013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND MATHIS
Defendant / Appellee:
D.L. YOUNG, Warden, OFFICER T. SWEENY, OFFICER J. SWAGER and others
Anthony Mathis v. Terra Renewal Services, Inc.
as 21-2368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY GORDON MATHIS
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRA RENEWAL SERVICES, INC. and DARLING INGREDIENTS, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
LJC ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
US v. Daniel Mathis
as 21-4578
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL LAMONT MATHIS, a/k/a Gunna, a/k/a Mooch, a/k/a D-Man
Roland Mathis v. Joel Ziegler
as 20-7478
Defendant / Appellee:
P. A. ELLIS, RDAP MR. CARNELL, DR. EDWARDS and others
Defendant:
P. A. HUTCHISON, OFFICER JAMES, OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND MATHIS
US v. Terrance Mathis
as 19-7229
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRANCE GERARD MATHIS, a/k/a T-2
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scott Marshall v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 19-1437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellee:
KENT MATHY and AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
