Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kurre et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
David Kurre, Brian Webber, Janet Webber and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., AGC Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Cooper v. Mathis et al
as 5:2023ct03015
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Cooper
Defendant:
Sgt. Mathis and Officer Stallworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morganherring v. Mathis
as 5:2018ct03358
Plaintiff:
William Morganherring
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pemberton v. Mathis et al
as 5:2017ct03073
Plaintiff:
Dandre W. Pemberton
Defendant:
D. Mathis, D. Watkins and J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Lendmark Financial Services, LLC
as 7:2016cv00355
Defendant:
Lendmark Financial Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shane Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dixon et al v. Prudential Prime Properties et al
as 4:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Dixon and Stephanie Dixon
Defendant:
Prudential Prime Properties , Jody Tingen , Pistol Tingen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Tripp
as 5:2015hc02168
Petitioner:
Ezra Mathis
Respondent:
Brick Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Faison, et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
John Dee Faison , Bernita Faison , Brenda Atkinson and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coasey et al v. Tatum et al
as 5:2013cv00523
Plaintiff:
Douglas Coasey , David Mathis and Sawand Reynolds
Defendant:
Mable Tatum, Stephen D Johnson, Brandon Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Darwin Johnson , Latonja D. Johnson and Brenda J. Mathis
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville , Fayetteville City Police Department , Shane Koehler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
