Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Cain v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care, Nurse Provider Leesia Smith, Ken Claud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Starks et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lee Starks, John Doe, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Outland v. Peek et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Rodger Outland
Defendant:
Nurse Shelia Peek, Cindy Wortham, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Cross et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Ofc Cross, Calloway County, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Mathis
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Gary Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mathis v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mathis v. Woods et al
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Mathis
Defendant:
Unit Manager Woods, Unit Sgt. Mann, Lt. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nalls v. Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Larry Nalls
Defendant:
Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Mathis H. Heck, Lee C. Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv02278
Petitioner:
Peter Mathis, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and M. Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
