Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kovalchuk et al v. Smith
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Maxim Kovalchuk and Julia Kovalchuk
Defendant:
Hon. Matthew P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04803
Plaintiff:
KRISTIAN SMITH and MATTHEW J. SMITH
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE and LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RILEY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv01320
Plaintiff:
MARCELLO RILEY
Defendant:
MATTHEW B. SMITH and NICHOLAS S. LIPPINCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. SMITH et al
as 3:2016cv00255
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
MATTHEW KENNETH SMITH , WIND TURBINE SOLUTIONS, LLC and WIND TURBINE SOLUTIONS, LLC RETIREMENT TRUST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Mitchell v. Guido et al
as 3:2016cv02194
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Mitchell
Defendant:
Edward E. Guido, Matthew P. Smith and Stacy B. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv01523
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RAQUEL R. SMITH and MATTHEW W. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al
as 2:2008cv00953
Petitioner:
MATTHEW LEE SMITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ROBERT SHANNON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 1:2008cv00695
Petitioner:
Matthew Lee Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Robert Shannon and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
