Cases 1 - 7 of 7
FemHealth USA, Inc. v. Rickey Williams, Jr., et al
as 22-5915
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEMHEALTH USA, INC., dba FemHealth USA, Inc., Carafem and FEMHEALTH USA, INC., dba Carafem
Defendant:
RICKEY NELSON WILLIAMS, JR., et al
Defendant / Appellant:
OPERATION SAVE AMERICA, JASON STORMS, MATTHEW BROCK and others
FemHealth USA, Inc. v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
FemHealth USA, Inc. doing business as carafem
Defendant:
Rickey Nelson Williams, Jr., Bevelyn Z. Williams, Edmee Chavannes and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Trespass on Public Land
Songer, et al v. Bledsoe County Government, et al (JRG1)
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Macey Songer and William Songer
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Government, Chase Roberts and Matthew Brock
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Olympus America, Inc. v. Zeus Urological Services, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv00242
Defendant:
Matthew Brock and Zeus Urological Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Olympus America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson-Bolinger et al v. Americore Health, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv00152
Defendant:
The Pineville Community Hospital Administrative Services Agreement Health Care Plan, HD Cannington, Estate of John Garfield Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa North, Amy Jackson-Bolinger and Pamela Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Jackson-Bolinger et al v. Americore Health, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
The Pineville Community Hospital Administrative Services Agreement Health Care Plan, HD Cannington, Estate of John Garfield Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa North, Amy Jackson-Bolinger and Pamela Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Brock v. USA
as 1:2012cv00294
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Matthew Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
