Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Steelmantown Church, et al v. Carlton County, MN, et al
as 26-1507
Plaintiff:
Steelmantown Church, Edward Bixby, Loving Earth Memorial Gardens, LLC and others
Defendant:
Carlton County, Minnesota, Sara Plante Buhs, in her official capacity, or her successors, as Carlton County Commissioner, Marv Bodie, in his official capacity, or his successors, as Carlton County Commissioner and others
Steelmantown Church et al v. Carlton County et al
as 0:2025cv02323
Plaintiff:
Steelmantown Church, Edward Bixby, Matthew Connell and others
Defendant:
Carlton County, Sara Plante Buhs, Marv Bodie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. McGee's Bar & Grill, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06067
Plaintiff:
Moises Hernandez
Defendant:
McGee's Bar & Grill, Inc. , Peter Fitzpatrick and Matthew Connell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. CONNELL et al
as 2:2012cv04652
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
MATTHEW CONNELL, PATRICK J. REILLY, EUGENE ROONEY and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cid et al v. Old Castle Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv01383
Plaintiff:
Martires Cid , Emilio Junco , Matthew Connell and others
Defendant:
Old Castle Corp., Matthew Connell and Eugene Rooney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Cid et al v. Old Castle Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv01384
Plaintiff:
Martires Cid , Emilio Junco , Matthew Connell and others
Defendant:
Old Castle Corp. , Matthew Connell and Eugene Rooney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Premium Sports Inc. v. Connell et al
as 1:2010cv03753
Plaintiff:
Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Connell, Patrick J. Reilly, Eugene Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Heffner et al v. Murphy et al
as 4:2008cv00990
Plaintiff:
Ernest F. Heffner, Ernest F. Heffner, Ernest F. Heffner and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Murphy, Joseph A. Fluehr, III, Michael J. Yeosock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
