Cases 1 - 7 of 7
L. et al v. Garcia et al
as 2:2026cv00404
Plaintiff:
J. L. and K. S.
Defendant:
Jared Garcia, Sharon D'Amico, Derick Zorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss, et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 26-1073
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM MOSS and MATTHEW COOMBES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL, MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRIAL COURT and others
Coombes et al v. The State of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2025cv13231
Plaintiff:
Matthew Coombes and Miriam Moss
Defendant:
The State of Massachusetts, The Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, The Massachusetts Department of Trial Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes et al v. Loyalty 360, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02433
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hayes, Ross Sudbury, Adam Campbell and others
Defendant:
Mark Johnson, Loyalty 360, Inc and Loyalty 360, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Coombs et al v. Goidel and Siegel, LLP et al
as 3:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
Matthew Coombs and Sherri Coombs
Defendant:
Goidel and Siegel, LLP, Jonathan M. Goidel and Peter H. McCallion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coombs v. Unique Refinishers, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
Matthew Coombs
Defendant:
Unique Refinishers, Inc. , Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC and Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Unique Refinishers, Inc. and Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC, Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, Inc. and Unique Refinishers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coombs v. Unique Refinishers, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv09435
Plaintiff:
Matthew Coombs
Defendant:
Unique Refinishers, Inc. and Intercontinental Hotels Group PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
