Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brown v. Chicago Police Department
as 1:2021cv01397
Defendant:
Daniel McNicholas, Armando Chagoya, Joshua Champion and others
Plaintiff:
Amir Brown and Maurice Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiatt v. Rockford Illinois Police Departments et al
as 3:2021cv50039
Defendant:
Brad Shelton, Matthew Hecker, Rockford Illinois Police Departments and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Joseph Hiatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiatt v. Rockford Illinois Police Departments et al
as 1:2021cv00433
Defendant:
Brad Shelton, Matthew Hecker, Rockford Illinois Police Departments and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Joseph Hiatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Riggs v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc., et al
as 18-16396
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY RIGGS, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, for the benefit of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, and PHILIP AND MARLENE UDALL as Next of Kin and Natural Parents of JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW HECKER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, BRENDA HALVORSON and others
Amicus Curiae:
GENERAL AVIATION MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
Mary Riggs v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc., et al
as 18-16396
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY RIGGS, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, for the benefit of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, and PHILIP AND MARLENE UDALL as Next of Kin and Natural Parents of JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW HECKER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, BRENDA HALVORSON and others
Riggs et al v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00912
Defendant:
Airbus Helicopters, S.A.S., Scott Booth, Brenda Halvorson and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Riggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
