Cases 41 - 50 of 213
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58552
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00430
Plaintiff:
Matthew Daniel Johnson and Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57310
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Cota v. USDC-NVR
as 21-71278
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL COTA, RYAN YOUNG, NADINE CHRZANOWSKI and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL COTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40203
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON-DRINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38551
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHNSON-DRINK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Eddington v. Jackson, et al.
as 1:2021cv01165
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Eddington, Jr
Defendant:
Kelvin Jackson, Jeffrey - Smith, Perry Rogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cota v. Malone et al
as 3:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
Michael Cota
Defendant:
John Malone, Thomas M. Gregory, Douglas County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00693
Defendant:
C/O Swisher, Lieutenant Miller, C/O Hagston and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00683
Defendant:
R. Oleary, Chad Adams, C/O Summers and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
