Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kezer v. Hillsborough County et al
as 1:2015cv00443
Defendant:
Xina Barnes, Hillsborough County, Matthew Masewic and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kezer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin, Jr. v. Dionne, et al
as 15-1895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. GRIFFIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIONNE, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, MATTHEW MASEWIC, DENISE RYAN, Health Services Administrator, Hillsborough County DOC and others
Perfetto v. Doe, et al
as 15-1840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN ANDREW PERFETTO
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE DOE, Mail Clerk, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, FNU ELLIS, Field Training Officer, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, FNU CROWELL, Correctional Officer, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER JONATHAN PLUMPTON
Rivera v. Hillsborough County et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Hillsborough County, Matthew Masewic and others
Plaintiff:
William Rivera
First Name Unknown:
FNU Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2013fp00539
Plaintiff:
John R. Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Hillsborough County, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, Matthew Masewic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perfetto v. Alexis et al
as 1:2012fp00393
Defendant:
Walter Alexis, FNU Boyer, FNU Crowell and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Andrew Perfetto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philips v. Hillsborough County et al
as 1:2010cv00319
Defendant:
Hillsborough County, Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent and Matthew Masewic
Plaintiff:
Lee Philips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
