Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tecumseh Mayes v. Matthew Roberts, et al
as 26-12099
Plaintiff:
TECUMSEH MONDEZ MAYES
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. PROPST, II, MATTHEW ROBERTS, SANDRA LIGON and others
Unknown:
SERVICE
Leonard v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv03269
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Leonard
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Elmore v. United States Courthouse
as 8:2026cv01597
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Elmore
Defendant:
United States Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elmore v. Department of Families and Children
as 8:2026cv01450
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Elmore
Defendant:
Department of Families and Children
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Elmore v. Internal Revenue Service
as 8:2026cv01342
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Elmore
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2026cv00127
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Chapman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ELMORE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 4:2026cv00200
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ROBERT ELMORE
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ELMORE v. MOTLEY et al
as 4:2026cv00178
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ROBERT ELMORE
Defendant:
NANCY MOTLEY, RAY MOTLEY and WILLIAM WEBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elmore v. The Salvation Army Homeless Shelter
as 8:2026cv00963
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Elmore
Defendant:
The Salvation Army Homeless Shelter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregory v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2026cv00025
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Gregory
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Unknown:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
