Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bartholomew v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Taylor Bartholomew and Adamas Hyahking Bartholomew-Bey
Defendant:
Matthew Smith, Dennis Wertz, Josh Kein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv02199
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer Gallagher, Officer Avendt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Department of Children & Family Services
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Defendant:
Department of Children & Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Harris v. Feeney et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Petitioner:
Joseph L Harris
Respondent:
Charles Feeney, Matthew Smith, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Matthew Smith
as 21-3352
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW SMITH
Smith v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00661
Plaintiff:
Steven Paul Parker Smith
Defendant:
Benjamin Wilkey, Jhonson and Matthew Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2018cv05723
Defendant:
Officer Lenoir, Sgt. Gotay and Officer Ruiz
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Anonymous Healthcare Provider "A" et al
as 2:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Defendant:
Anonymous Healthcare Provider "B" , Anonymous Physician "A" , Anonymous Healthcare Provider "C" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv02593
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY SMITH and MATTHEW SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ephrain v. Gossett et al
as 3:2015cv03359
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Ephrain
Defendant:
Greg Gossett, Zach Roeckeman, Rick Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
