Cases 31 - 40 of 4,743
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Crocco v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv05281
Plaintiff:
Matthew Crocco
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Rafaella Spone v. Matthew Reiss, et al
as 24-1684
Plaintiff:
RAFAELLA MARIE SPONE
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW REISS, LOUIS BELL, TOWNSHIP OF HILLTOWN and others
CASTRO-MOTA v. GIBBONS, et al.
as 2:2024cv01645
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
DIANE E. GIBBONS, JOHN T. FEGLEY, JILL M. GRAZIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MCDERMOTT v. GAIA ENTERPRISES INC
as 2:2024cv01596
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCDERMOTT
Defendant:
GAIA ENTERPRISES INC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 24-1634
Petitioner:
In re: SANDRA RUMANEK and DR. OLGA A. KATZ
Respondent:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, SHERRY R. FALLON, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
Smith v. Fattouh et al
as 1:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Louis Smith
Defendant:
Ahmed M. Fattouh, Brandon Bentley, Jeffrey Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
THE GEO GROUP, INC. v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2024cv04990
Plaintiff:
THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
PHILIP D. MURPHY and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
