Cases 1 - 10 of 2,363
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Vince v. Godlewski et al
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Vincent Anthony Vince
Defendant:
Matthew Godlewski, Jonathan Kaskey, Joseph Wozniak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC. v. WILSON et al
as 2:2024mc00033
Plaintiff:
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC.
Defendant:
MATTHEW WILSON, PEAK QUALITY PRODUCTS, LLC and HIXWOOD METAL LLC
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC. et al v. WILSON et al
as 2:2024mc00034
Plaintiff:
EVERLAST ROOFING, INC.
Defendant:
MATTHEW WILSON, PEAK QUALITY PRODUCTS, LLC and HIXWOOD METAL LLC
Interested Party:
INTERTEK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Tufano v. Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators
as 3:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Frank Tufano
Defendant:
Frankies Free Range Meat Conspirators, Erick Solares, Matthew Ptashnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD
as 2:2024cv02218
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALWARD
Defendant:
FCI OXFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
