Cases 1 - 10 of 636
BOGGS v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Defendant:
CHASE HOLMES, JASON MYERS, TRAVIS KEMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALVARADO v. SMOOT et al
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ISAAC ALVARADO
Defendant:
MATTHEW SMOOT and PRUITT TRUCKING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WATSON v. BINFORD
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
JAMES WATSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW BINFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GARRETT v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
MARKESE GARRETT
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GISLER v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW THOMAS GISLER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
LAUDERDALE v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, TONY SKINNER, SHERIFF, CANTEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WHISLER et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHISLER and AMBER WHISLER
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
EREN v. SUMMIT MANAGED SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
TANER EREN
Defendant:
SUMMIT MANAGEMENT and MATTHEW PIETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BURRITT v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BURRITT
Defendant:
EMERSON, AMY ROLLINGS and DAWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
