Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mauldin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00877
Plaintiff:
Melanie Buttermure Mauldin
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindgren v. Mauldin et al
as 2:2014cv01501
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lindgren
Defendant:
Rick Mauldin, Cindy Bergen, Mohammed Haleem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv01799
Plaintiff:
Alice Hancock
Defendant:
GEO Group Incorporated and Rick Mauldin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv02209
Plaintiff:
John G Jordan, Jr
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, John Gay, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv02206
Plaintiff:
Geary Wayne Walton
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, John Gay, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mauldin et al
as 3:2009cv08148
Petitioner:
Robert James Williams
Respondent:
Rick Mauldin and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Mauldin et al
as 4:2008cv00602
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Johnnie Mauldin, Bobby Douglas and M D Simba Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James v. Mauldin et al
as 2:2008cv00586
Petitioner:
Lin William James
Respondent:
Rick Mauldin and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rawson v. Mauldin et al
as 2:2007cv01438
Petitioner:
Jerry F Rawson
Respondent:
Rick Mauldin and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
