Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bushansky v. Sterling Bancorp et al
as 7:2021cv06558
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Sterling Bancorp, Jack Kopnisky, Richard O'Toole and others
Raul v. Sterling Bancorp et al
as 7:2021cv05560
Defendant:
James J. Landy, Fernando Ferrer, Ralph F. Palleschi and others
Plaintiff:
Malka Raul
Mitchell v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv22720
Defendant:
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Maureen Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv10762
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Maureen Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
MEYER et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02070
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PORTER, DIONNE REISERT, SHARON L. REITER and others
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Reitnour et al
as 2:2018cv04867
Defendant:
John T. Reitnour, Benjamin F. Reitnour, Sarah E. Reitnour and others
Plaintiff:
Maureen Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Meyer et al v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01243
Plaintiff:
Annette Porter, Dionne Reisert, Sharon L. Reiter and others
Defendant:
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015dp20017
Plaintiff:
Maureen Mitchell and Francis Mitchell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flauta et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 0:2013cv00327
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc and Janssen Research and Development, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cleo Flauta, Steve Cobble, Al Norooz and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
