Cases 1 - 10 of 40
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05920
Plaintiff:
DERIC MAURICE WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Boil & Roux Kitchen LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circut Events, LLC and G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
The Boil & Roux Kitchen LLC, Donald Mitchell, Ayce Catering LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Maurice Walker, Sr. v. William Sperfslage
as 22-3093
Petitioner / Appellant:
Maurice Walker
Defendant / Appellee:
William Sperfslage
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49289
Plaintiff:
ISIAH MAURICE WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Maurice Walker
as 21-2337
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE WALKER
Walker v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00304
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Maurice Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv01392
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Administration, United States of America and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Maurice Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Walker v. Sperfslage
as 4:2019cv00185
Petitioner:
Maurice Walker, Sr.
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Defendant:
William Sperfslage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02699
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Maurice Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
