Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Joshual Davis v. Ian Maxfield
as 23-7015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUAL LAMAR DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
IAN MAXFIELD, Sheriff Deputy, JOSHUA WILLIAMS, Sheriff Deputy and MARK SUROVICK, Sheriff Deputy
Defendant:
JARREL BAKER, Wake County Sheriff and WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Maxfield v. USA
as 3:2023cv02372
Petitioner:
Travis Cole Maxfield
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flowers v. Maxfield
as 5:2023cv01860
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Flowers
Defendant:
Captain April Maxfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett Spillard v. Hoffman, et al
as 23-15518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVERETT SPILLARD
Defendant / Appellee:
HOFFMAN, Dr., ELMI, Dr., A. NGUYEN and others
Maxfield v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00027
Petitioner:
Travis Cole Maxfield
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flowers v. Maxfield et al
as 5:2022cv04935
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Flowers
Defendant:
Captain April Maxfield, Charm Hedgemark and Jacob Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rosalez et al
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
R. Rosalez, Sergeant A. Cuevas, S. Stribling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Shonda et al
as 7:2020cv00578
Defendant:
David Collins, Officer Maxfield, John Shonda and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bratton v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2020cv03885
Defendant:
Dr. Sandler, C. Young, A. Maxfield and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Bratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado-Passage v. U.S. Federal Wildlife Services et al
as 5:2020cv00248
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Wildlife Services, United States Department of Interior, James Brandon Garretson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Maldonado-Passage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
