Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Mayor & City Coucil of Baltimore v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation
as 24-297
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS and MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., WELLS FARGO & CO. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC and others
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
as 1:2023cv03762
Not Yet Classified:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE and BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
Petitioner:
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv21156
Plaintiff:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant:
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. and Safariland LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. EPA
as 23-1621
Petitioner:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN, Administrator, U.S. EPA
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 2:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
