Cases 31 - 40 of 166
Martinez v. McDermott et al
as 2:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
Jorge Martinez
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, John or Jane Doe, Jon Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Garner v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Key, Peggy Katona, Richard James Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Varma v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv03541
Plaintiff:
Rajeev Varma
Defendant:
Charles Julian Brown, Michael Busenkell, Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown, LLC Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Keith Myers v. Jennifer McDermott, et al
as 22-1642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH MYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER MCDERMOTT, Warden, SERGEANT GESSNER, OFFICER MICHAELS and others
McDermott v. General Mills Sales, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01555
Plaintiff:
Melanie McDermott
Defendant:
General Mills Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
May, Edith v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Edith M May and Edith M. May
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin and Warden McDermott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. RGA 2015 Holdings, LLC
as 1:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Defendant:
RGA 2015 Holdings, LLC doing business as The Ashton Report
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Thomas Moorer v. City of Chicago, et al
as 22-1067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS MOORER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, JOHN VALKNER, Star No. 20111, JACINTO GONZALEZ, Star No. 20210 and others
Myers v. McDermott et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith Myers
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, Sgt Gessner, Officer Michaels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
