Cases 51 - 60 of 155
Allen v. SJN McDonalds
as 2:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
Roland Allen
Defendant:
SJN McDonalds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bartholomew Clark
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Pamela Harris, Charlotte Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph et al v. Hafez Corporation
as 1:2018cv00082
Defendant:
Hafez Corporation and Hafez Corporation doing business as McDonald's
Plaintiff:
Toccarra Ralph and Christopher Ralph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McDonald v. Bahama Bob's Beachside Cafe, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Walter McDonald
Defendant:
Bahama Bob's Beachside Cafe, Inc., Stephan W. Spellman, Jr., Frank B. Merrill, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McDonald et al v. Sharma
as 1:2017cv00231
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cody McDonald and Megann McDonald
Defendant:
Satendra Sharma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald et al v. City of Thomasville, AL et al
as 1:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Clarence McDonald and Cynthia Bryant McDonald
Defendant:
City of Thomasville, AL, Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Thomasville, AL and Water Treatment Plant of the City of Thomasville, AL
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alverson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00928
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn , Edward Ellington , Timothy McCorvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dunn et al
as 2:2016cv01855
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Smith
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Billups, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crandle v. Sims et al
as 1:2016cv00541
Plaintiff:
James Delester Crandle
Defendant:
C.O. Sims, L. Thompson, T. Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
