Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Leath v. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of et al
as 2:2023cv11407
Plaintiff:
Dena Leath
Defendant:
Denis McDonough, James Victorian, Shane Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Myers v. US Department of Veteran Affairs, Secretary of et al
as 2:2023cv10145
Plaintiff:
Korissa Myers
Defendant:
Secretary Denis McDonough, Department of Veterans Affairs, Joseph Jurasek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rowe v. McDonough
as 2:2022cv11768
Plaintiff:
Tonya Rowe
Defendant:
Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 790 Rehabilitation of Labor
Skrettas v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv11439
Plaintiff:
George Dimitrios Skrettas
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Denis McDonough
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tawfiq v. United States Veteran Affairs
as 1:2022cv10928
Plaintiff:
Neri Manassah Hamid Tawfiq
Defendant:
Denis McDonough and United States Veteran Affairs
Dale v. McDonough
as 1:2022cv10815
Plaintiff:
Sandra Dale
Defendant:
Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Newburry #851850 v. Morrison et al
as 1:2022cv00268
Petitioner:
Steven Allen Newburry #851850
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison, Paul Stutesman, John McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
