Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01572
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Thomas Goolsby v. County of San Diego, et al
as 20-55422
Defendant / Appellee:
OLSEN, Floor Deputy, ZEPEDA, Floor Deputy, MONDRAGON, Floor Deputy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS GOOLSBY
Barr v. Allen et al
as 2:2019cv01725
Defendant:
King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention Staff, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, King County Corrections Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Dwayne Barr, Jr. and Nathen Dwayne Barr, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Maleng Regional Justice Center et al
as 2:2018cv00737
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Wright
Defendant:
Hebron, King County, Spivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Haynes et al
as 3:2017cv05884
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E Parks
Defendant:
Ron Haynes, Bernard Warner, Jody Becker-Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diana Cherry v. Richard McKenny
as 17-55812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANA COLE CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD P. MCKENNY, 1 Fountain Square, Chattanooga, TN 37402 Erroneously Sued As UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Diana Cole Cherry v. Richard P. McKenny
as 2:2016cv07467
Plaintiff:
Diana Cole Cherry
Defendant:
Richard P. McKenny
Mckenny v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015at00828
Plaintiff:
Joseph Luise Mckenny
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McKenny v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01558
Plaintiff:
Joseph Luise McKenny
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Page v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2012cv05862
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lavis Page, Jr
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, K McKenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
