Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Prosser v. USHealth Advisors, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
USHealth Advisors, LLC, US Health Advisors, LLC, Patrick Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Enloe v. Krohn et al
as 2:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
James Enloe and Joshua James Enloe
Defendant:
Matthew M. Krohn, Brian Keedy, Kevin Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahon v. Robert Bosch Tool Corp. et al
as 4:2018cv00583
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey McMahon
Defendant:
Robert Bosch Tool Corp. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMahon v. Robert Bosch Tool Corp. et al
as 4:2018cv00505
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey McMahon
Defendant:
Robert Bosch Tool Corp. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maritz Holdings, Inc. v. McMahon
as 4:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
Maritz Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Christine McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. McMahon et al
as 4:2016cv00166
Plaintiff:
Herman Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert McMahon, Jason Davis, Bradley Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
McMahon v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01177
Plaintiff:
Julia A. McMahon
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA Inc , Organon International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mason v. Invision LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00575
Plaintiff:
Harold B. Mason
Defendant:
Invision LLC, Timothy McMahon, S. Eric Westacott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hilton v. McMahon et al
as 2:2010cv00666
Plaintiff:
Ben Gregory Hilton
Defendant:
Michael J. McMahon, Matthew Scott James, Michael W. Knotts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
