Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Howell v. McMahon et al
as 5:2014ct03100
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Duke Howell
Defendant:
Ed McMahon, William E. Owen, Does 1 - X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. McMahon et al
as 7:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Duke Howell
Defendant:
Ed McMahon, William E. Owen and Does 1 - X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dilworth v. McMahon et al
as 5:2013ct03291
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dilworth
Defendant:
Ed McMahon, Captain Adams, A.R. Fales, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingate Inns International Inc. v. Office Parks of Lynchburg, LLC et al
as 3:2013mc00181
Plaintiff:
Wingate Inns International Inc.
Defendant:
Office Parks of Lynchburg, LLC and Sam H. McMahon, Jr.
Dilworth v. McMahon
as 5:2013hc02211
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Dilworth
Respondent:
Ed McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lloyd v. McMahon et al
as 5:2012ct03163
Plaintiff:
Annis Recardo Lloyd
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon, Captain McNeish, Captain Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell et al v. Swisher Hygiene, Inc. et al
as 3:2012md02384
Plaintiff:
Norman Russell , Michael C. Birch , Lisa M. Birch and others
Movant:
John Nobel , Bryan T. McMahon , Joseph Meives and others
Defendant:
Swisher Hygiene, Inc. , Steven R. Berrard , Michael J. Kipp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Swisher Hygiene Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02385
Plaintiff:
Bruce James
Defendant:
Swisher Hygiene, Inc. , Steven R. Berrard and Michael J. Kipp
Movant:
James F. Caird , Harry F. Noyes , Eugene W. Stranch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. McMahon
as 5:2011ct03086
Plaintiff:
Shelly Washington
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
