Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Opoku v. City of Tumwater et al
as 3:2024cv05167
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Opoku
Defendant:
City of Tumwater, Tumwater Police Department, Jon Weiks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Danette Tunstall v. MCNIB Corporation et al
as 8:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Danette Tunstall
Defendant:
MCNIB CORPORATION and MCDONALDS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. McDonalds Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Smith and Tiffany R Smith
Defendant:
McDonalds Corporation and McDonalds Restaurants of Arizona Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16986
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Webb v. State of Washington, et al
as 22-36008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ROBERT WATSON FERGUSON, Washington State Attorney General, KITSAP COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Not Classified By Court:
JOHN GESE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
