Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rodney Lane, Sr. v. Unit Mg Ms. Martin, et al
as 23-14001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY MANGON LANE, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MG MS. MARTIN, MEDICAL SERVICES, WARDEN and others
McClure v. Mac Sim Detention Center et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Nathan Warren Fisk McClure
Defendant:
Officer Noland, Officer Williams, Officer Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Martin et al
as 6:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mangon Lane, Sr.
Defendant:
Unit Mg Ms. Martin, Medical Services, Warden Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Cox et al
as 6:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Lane and Rodney Manyon Lane
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Cox, Unit Manager Martin, Unit Manager Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFarley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv07041
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Drequan Quincy Tyrell McFarley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bell, Jr. v. Roger State Prison et al
as 6:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Officer Oliver, Warden Duloach, Roger State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Octavius Alexander Bell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustine v. Deville et al
as 1:2019cv00188
Defendant:
Cpt Tunner, Nurse Jones, James K Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustine v. Deville et al
as 2:2018cv14241
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Stroud, Nurse Jones, James K Deville and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFarley v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
James Christophe McFarley
Defendant:
Teddy Jones, Lt. Banks and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Winnfield Correctional Center et al
as 1:2014cv01183
Plaintiff:
Patrick O Hunter
Defendant:
Winnfield Correctional Center, Tate, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
